Showing posts with label PCGs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PCGs. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Challenge Based Learning Trifecta

"Woo-Hoo" Flickr CC by JAKULL
As the year ends, I am re-posting my five most popular 2011 musings.  This one was ranked #4 in page views.
---------------------------------
I have been more or less slogging away at the CBL wars for the past few weeks.  In some instances, particularly the professional development sessions (PCGs), it has been difficult to gauge how well things have been coming together.  So it was really nice today to find signs of success on three fronts:

* For the second consecutive day, staff planning for next year reported on some really interesting CBL projects.  In most cases they have moved from broad issues to logistics.  For the first time it is obvious that some really cool projects will be rocking the joint next year.

* Today, two "Fight Apathy" teams made presentations to their classmates on solutions for making teenagers care about politics.  The presentations were so sharp that the other teams  left the room chattering about how they needed an extra meeting or two to raise the bar on their own presos. (Yes!).

* A first AP Gov & Politics team presented to classmates both on their solutions and their panel experience.  This was very cool--  students had completely integrated the feedback from the "experts" on their panel into revised solutions.  Presenting to the class gave them a formal way of processing and owning the feedback.

This week has suddenly brightened up!

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Selling My Course and Reaping a Fortune?

Recently, I heard from a nice gentleman at Michigan Learns Online who expressed an interest in adding my bookless American Government materials to their online resources for teachers, administrators and students.  There would be a small fee involved, which is incidental.  I'd like to do it, but would need to add a few more pieces to the course and find the time to gather all the materials in order to "zip" it to him.

But the whole thing got me thinking more about shifting to a "hybrid" design for American Government.  That is to say, much of the core information for the course has been packaged for my students to be accessed 24/7.  We don't need brick and mortar meetings for "lectures", though of course I still want to use class time for questions and discussion.  Nevertheless, by placing less emphasis on information dissemination in the classroom, I would have more time for experiential learning.

Consequently, I have been floating ideas for projects with other teachers during our professional development meetings.  I call these "pipe dreams" at this point since we a months away from our 2011-12 roles at school, let alone in a position to plan course curriculum.  But here is some of the bait I am trying to use to hook the imaginations of others:

* I already use an elaborate legislative simulation which is technology intensive.  But the interplay among students is limited to our class.  We always include an immigration bill.  Could we possibly shift the game's focus entirely to immigration or Latino issues?  I'd love to collaborate with a Spanish teacher on this!

* One of our PCG teams is working on a media challenge.  It has gotten me thinking.  Wouldn't it me great to assign the students to create political ads?  Could I collaborate with a drama class for on camera talent?  Our "design" wonder-teacher, Susan Smith has already shown an interest in this.

* Our "Reimagine Detroit" team has produced a social justice challenge that Ann Lusch is going to use in her religious studies.  Hey, social justice?  Wouldn't that potentially be a great theme for an interdisciplinary collaboration?  The "Detroit" focus won't quite work for me, but this theme has legs!

* In the same way, our "right to life" group's focus on abortion is far too narrow for even my AP Government class curriculum.  But if we could broaden the life focus to include capitol punishment, end of life issues, or perhaps the social policies that contribute to or mitigate against the desire to get an abortion, I'd have a lot more room to operate in terms of connecting the project with the core curriculum.

My pipe dreams drifted over to my English courses too.  I have enough grounding in German or French films to feel confident in a film course collaboration with a foreign language teacher.  I also modestly believe that if I could convince the drama department to collaborate on Shakespeare, we might create one of the most popular courses in the school.

Do you have any ideas about a joint venture with me?  You certainly don't have to be a Mercy teacher to share a pipe dream or two with me.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

PCG #8 The Teacher's Role in Challenge Based Learning (part 1)

We have reached a point at Mercy where many teachers --- if they have not already begun implementing Challenge Based Learning projects-- can see themselves doing so in a coming semester.  Consequently, the time has been ripe to discuss the nuts and bolts of CBL.


We did not get very far-- I can already see that this is going to be a three part roll-out.  But our slow progress was for all the right reasons.  We discussed the CBL launch (How much information to share?) and team formation (Should students choose their own groups?).  And then we had great discussions about the first steps concerning how much direction the students should be given.  Of course at every juncture we are discussing the teacher's role.


More next cycle!


Friday, November 12, 2010

PCG #7 Obstacles and Opportunities

I had a peculiar experience with the seventh professional cluster group: Three of our professional development sessions took place before our in-service day.  Two took place afterwards.

The theme for each session was also the same: Obstacles and Opportunities.  However, the pre and post in-service groups took differing approaches.  Prior to in-service, the discussion centered on various ideas, frustrations, and anxieties which sere getting in the way of our development of challenge projects.  After the in-service, the focus concerned the kinds of training and  and logistical support that were desirable for nurturing these projects. Thanks to a very productive in-service day, we had shifted into a problem solving mode. In fact, the latter two sessions helped generate the themes for the next two or three PCGs: "The Teacher's Role in CBL" and "CBL Assessment".  Here are the slides used for the majority of the meetings:


In all five sessions I recommended one of my very favorite cloud applications-- Dropbox which uses cloud computing to enable users to store and share files and folders with others across the Internet using file synchronization" (Wikipedia).  I use three computers each day.  It's wonderful having access to the same files on the desktop of all three computers without the hassle of emailing them to myself or transferring them with external drives.

Have a nice weekend.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Larry as Guru and other Matters

Since school has started I have twice been introduced to new acquaintances as a "tech guru." I don't really mind, but the phrase is a bit loaded, don't you think? On the one hand I kind of deserve it since I have been appointed to spread the mystical vision of CBL this semester. But I also think it categorizes me as off in my la-la land of technology, communing with cyberspace. This notion amuses rather than offends. But I think the implication that I have secret knowledge to share is interesting. Hold this thought.

More obnoxious is being called a "techie." Again, I don't take this as an insult-- I think I just get blurred in with the IT guys. In fact sometimes  folks ask me for help with email, and printers when I really have no clue at all. Last year, a student ran down from the auditorium to see if I could problem solve a projector issue. And this year I was included on a 9th grade Tablet orientation team. In each of these instances, I was next to useless. Admittedly, I am fascinated with some gadgets. I am adept with some software as well as my Macs-- but as far as technology goes, I would describe myself as a generalist. Again, however, naming me "techie" like guru categorizes me as outside the pale.

Now to the point. I think this "guru" thing comes from my confidence developing projects that call for students to leverage technology of their own choosing.  I  "get" the technology and can even suggest they explore particular options. I find this necessary to the way I now teach.  So, I wonder, how much technology should any teacher know in 2010?  Haven't we reached a point in time where a teacher or administrator really must have some working knowledge with the powerful tools which are so integrated into modern life?  But how much is enough? 
-------------------------
"Paramhansa Yoganda " Flickr Creative Commons Photo by Prema01

Blog Archive