![]() |
Flickr CC Photo bydavidAigner |
The iPad’s functions fall more in line with current staff and student usage than our current device. What is more, the 400,000 apps available on the iPad (for a relative pittance) offer great opportunities for instructional customization and exploration.
The cost of a Mercy education should be measurably reduced for new students. Furthermore, our Wi-Fi system can accommodate the iPad, immediately, meaning that we will not incur major infrastructure costs in the transition.
The iPad is light, has a battery life that makes it through our school day, and boots up/shuts down almost instantly. We expect that the students will need little time “learning” how to use the device.
The iPad is a terrific e-reader. The lack of digital materials available on our laptops has been (along with cost) a chronic disappointment with our program. With e-texts becoming more available, the iPad is suited to to lightening book bags.
Needless to say, these major changes will help supply the Drive-thru with content in 2012!
Great decision! They will LOVE their iPads!
ReplyDeleteHow are you addressing the fact that Google Apps and iPads simply do not work well beyond rudimentary editing and view only?
ReplyDeleteI value both very much but the fact that they aren't playing nicely nor is there any signs they plan to start, it seems difficult to create a 1:1 environment with iPads and a foundation of Google Apps.